Defender held
War #775
MT
Malta
Attacker
VS
UA
Ukraine
Defender
Target: UA Ukraine

War Room

(20)
Log in to join the discussion.
UAJorjgvara3 دن

Радік - не парся з обороною, хай потішаться своєй перемогою

10

Все вірно, робимо як вони !

UAJorjgvara3 دن

все одно ми в плюсі в загальному рахунку)

10
UAJorjgvara3 دن

Даттон дали адмінський аккаунт погратися - потішить себе, але факт є факт без адмінського ресурсу прям ніяк)

UAJorjgvara2 دن

Повага Румунам за наполегливість! Ви бились мощно !

20

ВІтаю Україну з перемогою , дякую Мадярам за допомогу !

20
UAradik2 دن

ПРизнаюсь честно НЕ очикував такого исхода Браво

10

дякую

RODutton2 دن

"Congrats on the 'win' — but let's look at the numbers for a second. War report: 1.27 gold lost on our side vs. 4.63 gold burned on yours. You burned almost your entire elite and special ops stockpile from the last 22 days just to tick a box. That's not a victory, that's self-sabotage with extra steps. Funny thing about coincidences though, two accounts, same online rhythm, same synced legislation, same "I'd rather lose gold than let someone else win" playbook. There were plenty of free, undeveloped countries out there to farm resources from. Instead, the choice was to keep hitting the same neighbors, burning every stockpile, exploiting every bug available — just to slow one country down instead of actually building something. Respect to anyone fighting fair. For everyone else — the activity log tells its own story, whether or not people choose to look at it."

RODutton2 دن

Noticed the Hungarian connection too, by the way. Same pattern, gold, resources, troops flowing back and forth between accounts that suspiciously never seem to compete with each other. There's already a report tracking that chain: berci7 | player | Zoli75 (aka playerxxx) | | proton| delde. Multi-accounting to farm your own alliance isn't strategy, it's just a longer way to admit you can't win on equal footing. Every 'ally' conveniently turns out to be another controller, every war conveniently burns the same targets, every exploit conveniently gets patched right after it stops being useful to you. At some point the math stops looking like bad luck and starts looking like a system. We're not guessing, we're reading the same logs everyone else can read.

10
UAJorjgvara2 دن

What kind of fair play are you blathering about? They gave you admin rights—Malta—just so you could amuse yourself a bit.

RODutton2 دن

And here's the golden rule of economics, plain and simple: you can't spend more than you produce. If you consistently do, something's off. You're either cheating, or exploiting a bug. Look at the numbers again, 4.63 gold burned against 1.27, elite stockpiles wiped in one war, 'mega cities' built by skipping admin buildings that everyone else has to maintain. That's not efficiency, that's not skill. That's spending money that was never actually earned the normal way. Real growth is slow, boring, and rule-abiding. What we're looking at here isn't growth, it's a shortcut with someone else's name on the invoice

10
UAJorjgvara2 دن

For us, your loss is more important than gold))

RODutton2 دن

That is exactly what you posted from your other account. You claim that our loss matters more to you. If I lost a certain amount of gold and you lost nearly four times as much, where is the logic? Do you take pleasure in our losses, even though yours are four times greater? Did you spend four times as much just to stop me from winning? Well, I am doing the right thing. You are not. You demonstrated this during the war between Romania and Hungary, when you intervened. You continued the same behavior during the war between Romania and Malta, when you intervened again. Instead of passively earning 10% from our activity, you chose to deplete your own resources just to stop us from winning—even though you weren't even participating in that war. This is a flaw in your DNA. It's something confirmed by the various CR nationalities you have come into contact with.

20
RODutton2 دن

I imagine you’ve noticed that quite a few accounts labeled "frozen" have appeared recently. Sooner or later, the inevitable will happen. Those who exploit honest players will face the same fate. And to think things could have been so much simpler IF they hadn't taken the shortcut. It’s a shame about the wasted time.

20
UAJorjgvara2 دن

You're saying the same thing again, you want us to be banned)) You'd better tell me how you came to be in charge of Malta.

RODutton2 دن

It’s simple. I wrote an article over eight weeks ago. You can find it in the global community section. Just like now, I tracked the account logs—monitoring suspicious activity, city development, and actions taken—even though the posts were coming from the other account. I kept an eye on when the 30-day inactivity period expired. I deposited 5 units of gold into the account and made the purchase. Unlike you, I’ve invested nearly 8 units of gold in this simulator and play fair. My records show that I produce more than I spend—legitimately. I propose laws, just like you do. The difference between us is that you chose to exploit a system vulnerability. You could have done the same thing using the other account. Do you know when you gave yourself away? When you attacked a city. Then you did the same thing with the other account. Then you sent messages involving harassment and intimidation. You demanded that the referral be put on the market so you could buy it yourself. Then came the public messages from both accounts. The timing. After that, you carried out the same activities from both accounts. It’s confirmed. I know it, and you know it.

20

1.27 та 4.63 , це через баланс війни. Задай це питання рощробникам ! В цій грі хто атакує той має перевагу , а ти цього не знав . Не пиши нам цю херню краще напиши розробникам чому такий баланс війни дебільний !

RODutton1 دن

The war report in question wasn't referring to that, but rather to the fact that you are consuming more than your city produces. That should give you food for thought. You play using two accounts, harass other players, and take pleasure in the fact that others have used up the resources they earned honestly—as well as the gold they purchased—while you resort to cheap tricks (see Hungary's war, Malta's war, and Hungarian tricks) You sent soldiers into wars that didn't affect you—just to prevent us from winning—and even into conflicts where Ukraine gained 10% of what we were producing. You posted the same thing from two accounts: that you have a problem with Romanians, not with other countries. What is wrong with you?

20
RODutton1 دن

There is a category of people who live under a dangerous illusion: they believe that by putting out someone else’s light, their own room will suddenly become warmer or brighter. This is the greatest miscalculation of the human mind. Rejoicing in someone else's loss is a weakness. But becoming the very instrument that amplifies that loss—even though you gain absolutely nothing from it—is a form of spiritual and logical self-sabotage. In that moment, you are not a winner; you are merely a spectator setting fire to your own house just so its ash can stain your neighbor's clothes. The true value of an asset—whether we are talking about money, a relationship, peace of mind, or dignity—is only truly seen when you no longer have it. And while you are busy digging a grave for someone else, you fail to notice the ground collapsing beneath your own feet. No one has ever become wealthy from a bankruptcy they caused for another, and no one has ever earned respect through senseless destruction. At the end of the day, when the line is drawn, you are left only with what you have built yourself. If all you did was subtract from the value of others, you will realize that the equation of your own life has remained at zero.

20